|
|
|
|
Have a question? Send it in! Questions are answered by Rabbi Bartfeld.
|
|
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
|
|
|
|
|
# 2351 On a Handshake
|
|
|
Q. I am working in a lawyer's office. The lawyer is frum, but on the modern side. There is a client that came in and the lawyer shook hands with her. Afterwards, the lady extended her hand to me. My practice is never to shake hands with any lady under any circumstances, with no exceptions. What should I do, to avoid embarrassing my boss? It is obvious that we are both Yidden, so I cannot say that for religious reasons I don't shake hands. I also don't feel like giving this lady a lecture on how there are different opinions in Judaism.
A. On question 1336 in regard to returning a handshake to a non-Jewish lady, who is the CEO of the company, when she introduces herself to the prospective frum worker, and extends her hand to him in greeting, we wrote: Most Poskim prohibit returning a handshake. One of the first was Od Yosef Chai, (P. Shoftim 22) who quotes the European practice of clenching the hands of the host and hostess when arriving in a person's home, and states that because this expresses mutual feelings of friendship and affection, it is considered derech chibah or an affectionate act and therefore forbidden. Igrois Moshe (O. H. 1: 114) maintains that the modern handshake is likewise proscribed, even though it has become the standard greeting for men and women alike. Many other Poskim likewise rule that one may not shake any woman's hand, Jewish or not: (Oz Nidberu 2:73, Be'er Moshe 4:130,, Rivevos Efraim 8:596:8, Avnei Yashfei 2:89:1. Emes Le-Yaakov Even Ha-Ezer 21, footnote 4; Beis Avi 2:121. et. al.). There are some dissenting opinions, specially when causing embarrassment or kavod habrios is involved. It also should be mentioned that in modern times, a refusal to return a handshake is not anymore considered by many as embarrassing someone. This is due to the fact that this is constantly done by observers of other religions and individuals afraid of disease contamination).
In your particular case, foreseeing what is about to happen, one may just quickly take out a tissue from one's pocket and pretend to clean one's nose.
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that one should point to an imaginary wound or pain in his hand. (See next questions).
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/27/2019 12:53 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2350 Judging Another on One's Own Merits
|
|
|
Q. I bought a rather long list of items at a kosher store, and I was clearly cheated when being charged about ten dollars for something I did not buy. I didn't notice until I got home and I was debating if to go back and waste time that is more valuable to me than that sum. But I thought that just being mochel and forget and forgive the seller may not be correct, as he may be doing the same to other busy uncaring customers, and I may be indirectly sponsoring his stealing.
What is the correct thing to do in such situations? (I did go back, and the embarrassed seller returned the money).
A. As mentioned above in question 2347: Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that one must judge others Lekaf Zechus, giving them the benefit of the doubt. If a wrong was done, we must assume it was unintentional and against their conscious will.
It is quite possible and common that the cashier made a mistake, when many items were being checked out or there are many customers waiting in line.
The fact that the seller was embarrassed, does not prove that he consciously and willingly overcharged, since people also get embarrassed by mistakes they make.
On similar situations, even when a Din Torah is involved, people assume the worst on others and neglect to realize their own mistakes and that the reality is that they were the ones mistakenly cheating.
As mentioned, the above is of utmost importance in the current Yemei Ratzon times, when we prepare for the days when Hashem will judge us all, and we wish it will also be Lekaf Zechus.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/20/2019 5:28 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2349 Make No Mistake About It
|
|
|
Q. Re - If the Baal Tokea keeps on making mistakes, can one demand from the congregation that another Baal Tokea should blow instead, or should one go to another shul if possible?
A. See question above. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that one single individual cannot demand the removal of an already accepted Baal Tokea. It would require the due process established in the codes and rules of the shul. If there is a Rov in that shul, his Halacha decision is crucial.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/20/2019 3:02 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2348 Who Blew It?
|
|
|
Q. If the Baal Tokea on Rosh Hashana keeps on making mistakes in the shofar blowing is that considered to be a siman ra'a or bad omen for the congregation?
A. Mishna (Brochos 34b) teaches that if a Shaliach Tzibur that made a mistake, it is a bad omen for the people that send him, since an agent representing someone is like him.
Teshuvos Vehanhogos (O.H. 5: 176: 6) mentions that it applies also to a Baal Tokea.
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that siman ra'a does not necessarily apply to a Baal Tokea, that keeps on making mistakes by shofar blowing, since in essence he is not a shaliach representing the congregation.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/20/2019 3:00 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2347 An Answer to a No Answer Question
|
|
|
Q. I applied for a job at a frum school. I emailed the director at the personal email and then realized that because it was work related-that it should go out to the work email.
I never got any response back from either emails. After a little while I was expecting something along the lines of ‘sorry the positions were filled’ or, ‘not the right fit thank you.’ ....etc. Anything?
Do I have a right to feel annoyed or hurt?
Aren’t frum Jews actions supposed to be of a higher calling. Going the extra mile?
My thoughts being that yidden have a responsibility of Derech Eretz.
Unlike the non-Jewish world where they get applicants all the time and its “normal” not to get any kind of response...
Can the Rav kindly enlighten me with the Halachah.
A. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that on principle you are right, we are to maintain a higher calling specially if one directs a school and you should have been given a proper reply. However, one must judge others Lekaf Zechus, giving them the benefit of the doubt. If a wrong was done, we must assume it was unintentional and against their conscious will. Likely, in your case the director was overwhelmed by constant and difficult work issues. In our times people in top positions receive many numerous emails and messages, sometime even more than hundreds a day, and cannot possibly answer all.
Rather than sadly and hopelessly feeling annoyed and hurt, one should better engage in happier feelings of forgiveness and trust in Hashem's merciful direction of all events. The above is of utmost importance in the current Yemei Ratzon times, when we prepare for the days when Hashem will judge us all, and we wish it will also be Lekaf Zechus.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/20/2019 2:58 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2346 Forgive the Forget?
|
|
|
Q. Re- question above. If one forgot and the vehicle battery was not disconnected before Shabbos, but no AC, lights, clocks or indicating dials turn on when opening the door, can one be lenient in case of need?
A. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that one can be lenient in need, since the vehicle's computer does not provide at that time any essential need. This becomes a case of "eino miskaven" on a "p'sik reisha delo nicha ley," or transgressing with certainty an act, that is not intended and not needed on a Rabbinical prohibition.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/20/2019 2:44 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2345 Shabbos Sleeping at the Wheel
|
|
|
Q. Can one use a parked camper, motorhome, RV (recreational vehicle) or sprinter van or bus on Shabbos or Yom Tov, that has living quarters including bed, kitchen sink, fridge, freezer, oven, microwave, bathroom and shower, cabinets for storage. It is a vehicle that one can live in with the comforts of a modern home. It has hookups that connect water, electricity and waste for any campsite.
When one opens the doors, sleeps, eats or opens sliding doors, he does not cause light to come on.
You can turn on the water pump before Shabbos, toilet is not electrical.
A. On question 1180 in regard to climbing on Yom Tov or Shabbos on the back of a (parked) pick up truck where one build a suka when traveling and eating there. Or opening the doors of that truck if the light does not go on, or if one can push the truck (when in neutral) to a better location, in a fenced lot, we wrote:
"Shulchan Aruch (O.H. 624: 2) rules that one is allowed to build a suka on top of a “agalah” or carriage as long as it is firm enough to survive an ordinary wind. Mishna Berura (ibid. 10) also mentions to be careful that the suka should have the right dimensions.
Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is that in order to open the doors of the truck on Shabbos or Yom Tov, you may have to disconnect the battery of the vehicle since besides the lights some other unseen functions may be triggered by opening the doors in a modern computerized vehicle. (including security and temperature sensors, heating and AC controls, GPS, clock, and other indicators).
He also maintains that when needed one may push and move this truck to a desired location. (one should be careful not to press on the brakes, as the back lights will go on)"
Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a opinion in your case is similar. However, if a water pump is needed for the water to flow from the RV water storage tank, when one is not connected directly to the water provided by the campsite, even if the pump is left on before Shabbos, it may not be used since it will turn on when one opens the water tap.
Some of the more expensive models, have other automatic features, such as seat recliners, heated or cooled cup holders and other gadgets that have to be disconnected before Shabbos.
Because of the complications involved in the use of these modern vehicles, the Rov advises not to spend Shabbos or Yom Tov in them. In case of need, one should thoroughly investigate and understand the unique features of his particular model and how they work, as they do change from one type and model to another. Obtain the necessary information and diagrams, and then consult with a competent Rov.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/20/2019 2:36 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2344 The More The Better?
|
|
|
Q. Can the husband say kaddish together with the children, for his wife and their mother.
A. There are different minhagim and traditions. Although the obligation to recite kaddish, when there are sons is on them, some congregations allow the husband also to say if he so desires. Yalkut Yosef (Kivud Av Vaem 13: p. 599) adds that this applies to congregations where many say kaddish together.
Osrei Lagefen (p. 554) writes that it is "kedai" or worth it, for the husband to recite kaddish during the shloshim or yohrzait of his wife, even if she has children reciting it. Zichron Yitzchok (42: 23) adds also the rest of the year. The above is the tradition in many Sephardi and Ashkenazi communities also.
Horav Moishe M. Lowy Shlit'a maintains that indeed some have that minhag in Toronto also and he is supportive of it.
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that it should be recited only by the sons and not by the husband at all, as is the minhag of many communities.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/20/2019 2:25 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2343 Moving Rituals
|
|
|
Q. 2) (See re-interment question above, of a father buried in another city and being moved to Toronto.)
So they basically wanted to know:
(a) Does there have to be a shomer after the body is exhumed in F. until it is reintered here in Toronto?
(b) Is the reburial done just as a normal burial would be in terms of all the prayers, etc?
Thank you
A. Shulchan Aruch (Y.D. 403: 9-10) indeed maintains that proper shemira and honorable handling and transportation should be given to those remains.
Shiva is limited in re-interment cases to one single but complete day. We don't rule that part of the day counts as the whole day, as we do at the last day of a shiva. Keria or rending of the clothing is necessary as in the original burial (ibid. 403: 1).
There are different traditions in regard to if and which Tehilim should be recited and if any praises should be said at the re-interment act. The common minhag is that the Avelim are not required to attend the removal and re-interment of the remains.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/20/2019 2:19 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2342 The Moving Spirit
|
|
|
Q. 1) Shalom Aleichem Rebbe: I was calling about a question someone asked me about re- internment of their father from F. to Toronto.
She and her brother are not frum, but they want to have their parents buried (their ailing mother is planning on being buried here) in Toronto so they can visit the graves.
I know that there is a shailah about reburial for this reason, but they will probably go ahead anyway.
(If this is not permitted, should one help? See next question)
A. The removal of the remains requires the supervision of members of a reliable Chevra Kadisha. This is due to the need of the proper removal, not only of the body remains, but also of the earth they may have become mixed with when decomposition began. Additionally, experienced care is essential on order to honor those remains, when being extracted and transported. It is unlikely that a reliable Chevra Kadisha will engage in a prohibited disinterment act.
Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a suggested that if the F. Beis Olam is in danger to become in the future abandoned or neglected since the Jewish Community there today is rather small, that may be a valid reason for re- internment.
The Rov also suggested, that the children and the ailing mother buy their kevarim already now in Toronto, thus creating a Kever Avos plot, to which reburial is permitted.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
Q. 2) (See re-interment question above, of a father buried in another city and being moved to Toronto.)
So they basically wanted to know:
(a) Does there have to be a shomer after the body is exhumed in F. until it is reintered here in Toronto?
(b) Is the reburial done just as a normal burial would be in terms of all the prayers, etc?
Thank you
A. Shulchan Aruch (Y.D. 403: 9-10) indeed maintains that proper shemira and honorable handling and transportation should be given to those remains.
Shiva is limited in re-interment cases to one single but complete day. We don't rule that part of the day counts as the whole day, as we do at the last day of a shiva. Keria or rending of the clothing is necessary as in the original burial (ibid. 403: 1).
There are different traditions in regard to if and which Tehilim should be recited and if any praises should be said at the re-interment act. The common minhag is that the Avelim are not required to attend the removal and re-interment of the remains.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/20/2019 2:09 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2340 For The Not-Foreseeable Future
|
|
|
Q. One who is undecided if to go ahead with a proposed shiduch and choose a marriage partner, and is emotionally very affected by the uncertainty and doubt. Is it recommended or even permissible to follow the
Goral of the Vilna Gaon? What is exactly the procedure?
A. (See question above) Shulchan Aruch (Y.D. 179:1) rules that one may not consult stargazers or perform goralos. Following the Ramban, the Rema explains that this prohibition is based on the instruction of tamim tihiyeh—rather than on the negative commandments of nichush and me’onen.
Malbim (Hatorah Vehamitzvah, 66) writes that the mitzva of wholeheartedness with Hashem relates to all forms of future-telling, “even to those forms that are not prohibited.” It obligates us to rely on Hashem, and not to live our lives according to the recommendations of fortune-tellers and soothsayers—even those whose practice does not violate any prohibition.
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that in our times, one should abstain completely from using any kind of goral or casting of lots to divine the future or to choose a course of action, including the Goral Ha-Gra.
The Rov maintains that the Goral Ha-Gra. should only be used when a human life depends on it and by a Tzadik that is familiar with it.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/13/2019 5:55 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2339 Lots on Casting Lots
|
|
|
Q. Q. Re- above question. Why is it permitted to flip a coin to establish who has rights or is the owner of a property. does that not contravene the prohibition of not divining the future or the positive commandment of Tamim tichye?"
A. Rishonim disagree as to if one is permitted to use a goral or the casting of lots, to determine what is to be the future or to decide the next course of action. They deal with differences between relying on omens for the future, or for indications of the past, and If not permissible what are the prohibition transgressed.
Rambam (Avoda Zara 11) discusses the prohibitions of divination and necromancy together with witchcraft and sorcery and other prohibitions related to the ways of idolaters. He concludes with: “All these matters are matters of falsehood and deceit, and it was with these that the early idolaters made the other [non-idolatrous] gentiles deviate and follow them. It is not fitting for Jews … to use such nonsense, or even to think that they are of any use... Because of this, when warning us against these nonsensical practices, the Torah says, ‘You shall be wholehearted (Tamim) with Hashem, your G-d."
Rambam (ibid, 11: 8-9; Commentary to Mishnah, Avodah Zara 4: 7) rules that consultation with stargazers is included in the prohibition of divining (me’onen), or, alternatively, in the prohibition of reading signs (menachesh).
The Ramban (T. Meyuchasos, 283), however, sees the practice of stargazing in a different light. In his opinion, the practice does not violate any of the negative prohibitions defined by the Torah, because it is a matter of wisdom rather than a matter of divination and sorcery.
He rules that if one receives unsolicited advice from a stargazer, he is permitted to follow this advice, for instance, by increasing his performance of mitzvos so as to overturn the decree. Nonetheless, the Ramban rules that actual consultation with stargazers is prohibited, for it violates the instruction of tamim tihiyeh, the obligation to be wholehearted with Hashem.
On Sanhedrin (65b) Tanaim dispute the Biblical prohibition of using omens. The first opinion lists such omens as food falling from one’s mouth or a deer crossing one’s path. The second source lists studying the conduct, communication, or migratory patterns of fish or birds.
However, we find contradicting opinions. Talmud mentions omens such as a solar or lunar eclipse, which are a good and bad sign for the Nation of Israel, respectively. A number of Talmudic anecdotes (Chulin 95b) details signs and omens that were used by various Sages. Rabbi Yochanan, for instance, asked children which verse of the Torah they were studying. According to Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar, it is permitted to utilize a house, child, or woman, as a sign.
In addition to signs and omens, we do find that a number of Torah leaders over the generation employed different forms of goralos, “lots,” that involved opening the Torah or Tanach at certain places, in order to resolve difficult dilemmas. One of the most renowned of these goralos is the Goral Ha-Gra. Even today some continue to practice various forms of goralos. (See next question).
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/13/2019 4:22 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2338 Two Sides of the Same Coin
|
|
|
Q. Two friends who daven in the same shul are competing to acquire a High Holidays front seat, that for x reason they are both entitled to. They decided between them to flip a coin. But after the coin was in the air and the side of the coin was chosen and called, the tosser missed catching the coin and it fell on the floor. The looser claimed that this is not the correct procedure and the coin should be flipped again. Does he have a claim?
A. Talmud (Bava Basra 106b) derives from the goral or the casting of lots performed when the land of Eretz Yisroel was divided, that similar methods could be used for the division of properties owned by partners or heirs.
Chavas Yoir (61) Sdei Chemed (K'lalim 3: 14) and others maintain that when the goral is performed properly and with honesty, the raffle is irrevocable and it is most powerful. They compare the one who denies its effectiveness and validity. to one who denies the Ten Commandments
The Talmud discusses how a raffle works. At first, compares it to the division of Eretz Yisrael by Yehoshua Bin Nun, although in that scenario there were also the Urim V’Tumim, which was a form of prophecy. Ultimately, the Gemara suggests that it is because there is a mutual benefit to the parties thus there is assumed agreement to the outcome.
In our particular case. since it was agreed by both parties to rely on the tossing of a coin, it takes effect and the participants cannot back up on their agreement.
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that the fact that the coin fell on the floor instead of being cached by hand, does not cancel the coin-flip, unless it was so stipulated, since if the case was reversed, the now wining party, would likely accept it.
Often, in public ball games and sports, the official tossing of the coin is done by letting the coin fall to floor, as it is more visible. (Wikipedia). It is also less likely to be affected by hand-trickery and deception.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/13/2019 4:17 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2337 Attention on Pay
|
|
|
Q. A number of years ago I taught an older person, a Ba’al Teshuvah whose family wasn’t frum. After he was niftar, by the levaya I came over to his sons and told them that it is important that Kaddish be said for their father and that it is better if they have a hand in it — by donating a symbolic amount of money to hire someone to do it. They gave me a couple of dollars for the cause. After that I came over to a group of yungerlite and told them that Kaddish needs to be said for the niftar. One of them responded: ‘’ Yes, yes, I'm saying Kaddish for him!’’ I got flustered and forgot to give him the money. After the 11 months, I remembered about my mistake. I think I did not tell that yungerman anything about the money. To find the sons may be not easy. What should I do about the money?
A. To correctly answer this question, a number of necessary variable facts are missing. Some of them are;
1) Was that money given to you as your personal compensation for finding the kaddish reciter, or as a payment for him?
2) Did the "yungerlite" you approached, mean that he was already saying kaddish for the niftar before you asked him?
3) Do you know who that "yungerlite" is and can you reach him?
Since there may be additional questions, and as with other similar questions concerning monetary issues, Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that a local competent Rov, that is more familiar with the case should be consulted.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/13/2019 4:07 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2336 Rebirth in Purity
|
|
|
Q. Can a woman who is about to convert and go to the mikva, do so if she is a nidda? Or does she have to purify herself first? If she feels that she wants to be totally tahor and pure before accepting the Torah and mitzvot, should she immerse for nidda also?
Is she required to study the Laws of Nidda before conversion?
A. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that she can convert while being a nidda, as has been done throughout history. There is also no point to be tovel for nidda impurity, before the immersion of gerus takes place, since at that time, she is still a Gentile and the nidda mitzvos and effects do not yet apply to her. The tevila at that time will not make a difference, on her nidda status. One should add, that our tradition is that unmarried women do not immerse in a mikva.
See question 942 regarding a married couple that convert together.
She also does not have to know the laws of nidda, until she is ready to get married. However, she should know the basic principles involved, as part of her acceptance of mitzvos at the time she converts.
She should also know well the laws of chatzitza or barriers to immersion, construed by substances that interpose between the body and the mikva water, as they are essential for her proper gerus immersion.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/13/2019 3:55 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2335 Flash in the Pan
|
|
|
Q. If someone was making eggs in a not-ben-yomo fleishig frying pan, and the eggs were hot. At that time someone placed a piece of cheese on top of the eggs. It was immediately realized that it was a mistake, and the cheese was removed from on top of the eggs. What is the status of the frying pan? Thank you.
A. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that the eggs are permitted. However, the pan should undergo preferably hagga'ala.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/13/2019 3:40 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2334 Framing that Picture Frame
|
|
|
Q. I'm confused regarding the digital picture frames discussed in previous questions.. I'm not sure where my type of screen fits in.. I have a picture frame that is connected to a specific email address that only my children have. They send a picture from their email to my picture frame email and it gets displayed on the screen. They are obviously not sending my pictures on Shabbos .. The pictures change in random sequences as they get displayed.. Is it permitted to leave on during Shabbos?
A. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that if one keeps it on constantly, does not usually change the settings or pictures manually and it does not play any sounds, it is permitted to keep it on during Shabbos.
(Care should be taken, since some manufacturers recommend to turn off their product daily to avoid overheating).
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/13/2019 3:32 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2333 When News is Good News
|
|
|
Q. Regarding the prohibition of relating sad news on Shabbos - may one relate sad news to his friend, in order to relieve himself of the tremendous emotional tension of holding it in, or in order to ask his close friend for an eitza regarding the situation (such as one who urgently needs a new apartment as he is being evicted, and he wants to ask his friend for an eitza?)
A. Mishna Berura (307: 3) rules that on Shabbos it is prohibited to tell something that will cause pain and suffering. This prohibition applies also to reading sad articles or detrimental news including posted funeral notices that can depress and bring sorrow to the reader. (Ketzos Hashulchan 107" 43, Menucho Shleimo 8:7, Mishnas Yosef 7: 72, Piskei Teshuvos 307: n. 217).
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that it is permitted in need. Although the friend may become distressed when hearing the doleful situation of his companion, knowing that just by listening and letting the suffering one vent his emotions will bring relief to him, the greatness of this mitzva will also bring a degree of valuable joy to the listener. So much more if he can actually help and give counsel to a friend in need.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/13/2019 3:29 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2332 Send Back the Bring Back To Life?
|
|
|
Q. 1) If someone calls Hatzalah on Shabbos and then it turns out that everything is fine (for example a child choking and the food comes out), should he call back hatzalah to cancel the call?...
A. Some physicians recommend to have the child checked medically anyway, as other unseen damage may have occurred.
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that it is highly likely that by the time he is able to call back, the Hatzalah team has already been dispatched and they are about to arrive. Add other multiple variables such as the number of calls usually expected during a regular Shabbos and the need for the availability of responders, the instructions given to the dispatcher of this particular Hatzalah team, etc., it is best not to call back, or at least if deemed necessary, to call back with a shinui, (change) or by asking a Gentile to call back.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/13/2019 3:20 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2331 Read Your Mind Aloud
|
|
|
Q. On question 2320 and other previous ones (1849, 1850) you wrote that Horav Miller rules that one should be always be “Mosser Modoah” or declare, preferably in front of the beis din when he makes hattoras nedorim or the annulment of past oaths, vows and pledges on Erev Rosh Hashana, that any future commitments and pledges done for charity, even done only on one's mind, should not be counted as a nedder or an oath. Does one actually have to mention the above and include it in the messiras modoah declaration?
A. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that even if one did not declare specifically or mention openly charity nedorim done only on one's mind, they would be included in the general declaration.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 9/13/2019 3:07 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
Important Numbers
