|
|
|
|
Have a question? Send it in! Questions are answered by Rabbi Bartfeld.
|
|
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
|
|
|
|
|
# 1665 Back to Flat on Back
|
|
|
Q. Hello Rav,
Due to multiple physical issues I've been having, my chiropractor has prescribed that I should sleep on my back with various foam-rolls under my neck and back for as much of the night as possible. The Kitzur Shluchan Aruch says lying on the front or back is not permitted. Is it allowed for medical reasons or is it very strict prohibition? Not sure if this is a factor, but I am married and I've never had a problem with nocturnal emissions.
thanks so much.
A. Mishna Berura (239: 6) rules that it is a severe prohibition to lie flat on ones back or front (parkedan). Shalmas Chaim (226) permits awakening someone sleeping in that position.
Although from the Talmud (Brochos 13b), Rashi, Rishonim and Poskim it would appear that the prohibition applies only when someone is sleeping, some Poskim maintain that one should always avoid lying flat on ones back (Divrei Yisroel 3: 137, Piskei Teshuvos 239: 8, et. al.). However, even the above permit, when there are medical issues involved (ibid.).
Medical doctors we consulted were unaware of a natural biological sex arousal reaction in our days when lying in that position.
Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is to be lenient in medical need.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/23/2018 1:13 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1664 Corn Drops
|
|
|
Q. An elderly patient that needs as part of his diet a room temperature water drink mixed with corn starch (potato starch is not an option). He is able to seat by the seder and Yom Tov meals together with his family. As he often drips some of his drink, can he seat using the same tablecloth and dishes as the rest of the present?
A. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that preferably he should use a disposable tablecloth, plates and cutlery, if possible. Otherwise, the utensils he uses should be marked and washed in a sink not in the Pesach kitchen. If unmarked dishes were used, after the fact the dishes are permitted.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/23/2018 12:52 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1663 A Can of Corn?
|
|
|
Q. A socially responsible alternative for people who buy bottled water. is the corn based biodegradable plastic used in the UK. And available now in Canada. The corn-starch bottles are made from a type of plastic called polylactic acid (PLA). The bottles could be commercially composted back to soil in 12 weeks. Since corn starch is kitniyos, can they be used on Pesach?
A. As the name implies, corn starch biocompostables are made from corn starch. The starch is converted into a polymer, the main ingredient in materials that have a plastic-like feel. The plastics can be clear or opaque, soft or hard. A kind of acid called polylactic acid (PLA) is made from the corn starch. This is why corn starch biocompostables are sometimes called PLA plastics.
In the past there were shailes in regards to paper plates, paper towels and napkins that generally also contain starch. Some forms of raw starch are kitniyos, such as corn starch, while other forms of starch, such as wheat starch, are actual chametz. In the U.S, it can safely be assumed that starch used in manufacturing is kitniyos, most probably corn-based. Many contemporary Poskim maintain that though one should not intentionally add kitniyot to food, with respect to paper goods this is not a concern because the starch that is part and parcel of the paper itself is nifsal mei’achila (inedible). (If paper goods contain wheat starch, the fact that it is nifsal mei’achila may not suffice to permit their use, see Magen Avrohom 442:4). Based on the above, in the US, OU rules that one may use paper plates, paper towels and napkins even if not certified for Passover. (See: oukosher.org/passover/guidelines/non-food-items/non-food-items/.)
Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is that one can be lenient when necessary.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/23/2018 12:40 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1662 Now You Are Talking
|
|
|
Q. Re - question 1660 (In regards to speaking during Hallel at the Pesach seder) - Why do you say that our tradition is not to say a Brocho? Every Haggodo ends Hallel either with the Brocho said normally at the conclusion of Hallel, or with the Brocho of Yishtabach (according to our Aschkenazic tradition).
Secondly, how can the principle of “ein masichin al kos shel brocho” apply here? Maggid is said also with the 2nd Kos, and there we talk and discuss plenty.
Chag Kosher V'Somayach,
A. Unlike the Hallel recited during tefilah, we do not recite a brocho at the beginning of the Hallel said during the Hagada reading. (See O.H. 422: 4, in respect to talk being a hefsek during Hallel in tefila).
In regards to your second question, Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a explained that during the maggid section of the Hagada the mitzva we are performing is telling the story of yetzias Mitzraim and explaining it, is part of the mitzva. Not so during the Hallel section, when we are engaged in praising Hashem. This being similar to what we say (Shabbos 10a)” Z’man Torah lechud Z’man Tefila lechud.” Tefila and praise to Hashem, stand separate and are different from Torah learning.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/23/2018 12:26 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1661 Steal a March?
|
|
|
Q. On question 1655 the Rov expressed that because of tzenius issues, one should not participate on marathons or large walking events. I have seen in past occasions that some Gentiles that seem to be of the type to be employed to be care givers to the Jewish elderly do participate. I’m wondering if one can make them a shaliach or an agent to represent him/her on the march or marathon. Would that be permitted or recommended?
A. In principle a Gentile cannot become a shaliach or an agent for fulfilling or complying with mitzvos on behalf of a Jewish person, even when it would work for another Jew.
However, Horav Slomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is that on certain instances, when it is necessary one may indeed ask a non-Jew to follow or perform a mitzva on his behalf.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/23/2018 2:09 AM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1660 Free Speech?
|
|
|
Q. During the Seder shel Pesach, may I interrupt the saying of Hallel to speak about a section to which I wish to draw the family's attention so that they may think about this idea or concept when they are reciting the specific passage of Hallel, or does this explanation constitute a Hefsek and make reciting the blessing at its conclusion a problem?
A. Rishonim disagree whether Hallel is recited with a brocho before starting, during the seder. (See Tur end of 473 and Mishna Berura 480: 1). Although our tradition is not to say a brocho before, Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is that one should not be mafsik lechatchila while reading it. The reason, he pointed out, is quoted in Biur Halocho in the name of Ramban (473: 2; D;H; hareshus beyodo), namely that once the cup of wine has been filled, one should not be mafsik. The Rov added since “ein masichin al kos shel brocho” (Brochos 51b).
As important as explaining what is being said is on the night of Pesach is, one should explain before or after the reading.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/22/2018 1:01 AM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1659 The Soft Sell
|
|
|
Q. Could Horav Miller please revise the following instructions set for people selling their chometz. Is everything correct?
Notice
1. Please read the contract on the reverse side and become familiar with the
transaction.
2. If the contract includes chometz that belongs to someone else, please be sure
that you have received at least verbal authorization from the owner to include
it in this contract.
3. Please be meticulous in checking only those items that you have or
may have. Checking all items indiscriminately does not do the transaction
justice.
4. All items included in the sale should be sealed off and made inaccessible by
locking, taping, tying or erecting a mechitza.
5. Chometz pots, dishes and eating utensils are not sold, but must be secluded
and made inaccessible nonetheless.
6. Chometz which may be in a secluded area of an appliance (e.g. motor housing
of a mixer) is included in the sale.
7. Kitniyos (legumes such as rice, beans, etc.) need not be sold, even though we
do not eat them on pesach.
8. Be aware, that from the time of the sale to the non-Jew, the purchaser has
right of access to any area which is rented to him, or any chometz that is sold
to him and he may take it and use it as he wishes even on Yom Tov. He will owe
you the remainder of the purchase price as will be determined by three
experts after Pesach.
9. Please write legibly, especially your name and address, so that the purchaser
can know who the seller is and where the chometz is located.
A. The following are the changes that Horav Shlomo Miller shlit’a recommends;
On paragraph 2; One should insist when possible on a written authorization.
On 4 and 5; Sealing, locking and taping may not be effective without a mechitza at least ten tefachim height (about a meter), if the chometz is kept on a box, dresser, suitcase or similar, that is by itself less that ten tefachim. Sealing, locking and taping, would work without a mechitza on a room, closet or locker that is more than ten tefochim.
On 8; Needs clarification: Not the remainder of the chometz not taken, rather the amount still owed after the deposit was given. The non-Jew agrees that in case of any disagreement, the matter will be settled by a Jewish Rabbinical court.
The Rov also maintains, that it is indeed better not to write the approximate value of the chometz sold.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/20/2018 11:19 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1658 Made To Order
|
|
|
Q. On tefilin shel yad, if the last parsha became pasul, can yo cut it off and glue a new correct parsha recently written so it will be kesidrom (in order)?
A. Shulchan Aruch (32: 47) and Mishna Berura (ibid. 219) maintain that on the onset the four parshios of the tefilin shel yad should be written on one single parsha. If they were not, after the fact they should be joined together with kosher glue. If one of the last parshios became disqualified, one could cut that parsha off and glue a new one that was written after the first ones, so the kesidron order will be kept.
Keren Ledovid (8) asserts that one who sells tefilin has to inform a prospective buyer, that the shel yad parshios are glued together, since the value of tefilin with parshios shel yad glued together, may be less than if they were one single parchment.
The above applies only to complete parshios, however one may not glue together the parts of a single parsha. (Piskey Teshuvos 32: 72).
Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is similar.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/20/2018 12:46 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1657 Into the Mouth of Babes
|
|
|
Q. Is it permitted to give infants infant formula that contains chometz or lacks a kosher for Paysach symbol?
A. Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is that if it contains chometz it is prohibited to keep it in one’s possession or derive any benefit from it during Pesach. In general, one should always avoid when not essential, feeding non-certified kosher foods even to infants.
If the list of ingredients shows that there are no chometz components in the food, in case of great need one can feed the non-certified kosher L’pesach items to infants during Pesach.
Kitniyos or food that contains legumes would also be permitted in such a case.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/16/2018 6:06 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1656 Small Fortune
|
|
|
Q. We use in our minyan (when needed) a very small Sefer Torah, usually used in the house of avelim r’l. I noticed that due to the small size of the letters, the alef zeirah of parshas Vayikra is almost the same size as a regular alef. Can you read lechatchila from such a Sefer Torah, especially on this Shabbos?
How much smaller does the alef zeirah normally have to be? Is that a Halacha Lemoshe Misinai?
A. Mishna Berura (32: 1) quotes Magen Avrohom that the size of the letter daled of echad should be four times larger than a regular daled on the rest of the letters. He then adds that it may not be referring to the actual size of the letters of this particular writing, but any letters even the most minute possible. Mishna Berura concludes that as long as the daled is a bit larger than any other daled written on this parchnent, it is acceptable.
Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is that in regards to the alef zeira the same applies, and if it only a bit smaller than the normal one complies. Although these letters are part of the massores and therefore were given in Sinai, the lack in correct size does not disqualify the Sefer Torah.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/16/2018 2:53 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1655 Talk the Walk
|
|
|
Q. Hello Rav,
Is it permissible for an adult male to participate in a marathon or a large walking event where large groups of people walk together for "a cause"? A couple potential issues would be the fact that you are putting yourself in a place where non-tznius women will be all around you in close proximity and hard to avoid seeing, plus the challenge of avoiding walking behind behind a woman or in between two women. Thanks
A. Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is that even if the marathon is for a correct and worthwhile cause to support, one should abstain from participating in it, due to the tznius issues involved. Although we do walk and drive in the streets on summer days, it is because we have no available alternative, not so in this case. The Rov added that this is a coordinated group activity where participants share the act as one unit, as opposed to individuals walking or driving in a street. The Rov suggested that there are other meaningful ways to provide support and assistance to worthwhile campaigns.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/16/2018 12:16 AM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1654 Licensing a Brocho by License Plates
|
|
|
Q. Re- question 1650 - If you cannot say tehilim when facing a cross in an adjoining cemetery, how can you say kidush levana on the street, since all Ontario vehicle plates have a cross on them?
A. On question 93 we mentioned: “Q. My wife bought crystal candlesticks holders to give as a present and she noticed that on the brand name of the product on the box and on the candlestick there is a crown with a cross on it. Are we allowed to give the present to a Jewish couple or is better to get a different gift.
I would also like to know why nobody is concerned with the cross on the car plates in Ontario.
A. Remoh (Y.D. 141,1) prescribes that a cross, worn on a necklace and used as a symbol and not as an object of direct worship is permitted (in benefit). Many Poiskim allow the use of coins, stamps or utensils that have a cross on them, since they are used only as a decoration. (Shach ibid., Chochmas Odom 85,1, see also Igrois Moishe Y.D. 1,69 in regards to a medallion or an award). Some Poiskim advise to take off or erase part of the cross.(ibid.). The above would apply to car plates too.
Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit”a opinion is that even if they are permitted in use, one should preferably not have them around in one’s home, especially not on the candlesticks of the Shabbos table.”
See also question 1116 in regards to melting a gold cross to make a tzion: “Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is that if the cross was seen and served as an idol itself and was worshiped as such, it would become prohibited in benefit. However, if it was only a symbolic object, representing another deity, it would be permitted.”
We may also add that Noda Beyehuda (Y.D. 2: 180) also permits using coins that have an image of idolatry stamped in them since they were not made with the intention of serving avoda zara and it is the hand of the coin stamper that matters. It is unlikely that the workman who presses the buttons when stamping coins or license plates, has any relevant thoughts involved. Similarly Igros Moshe (Y.D. 1: 69 quoted above) permits the use and commercialization of stamps that have an imprinted cross on them, quoting Tosafos (Shabbos 149) that it is permitted when the intention is only for decorating. He also cites Tosafos (Avoda Zara 50) that provides another reason to be lenient on coins, since one is accustomed to the constant use of them. He adds a third reason for the permitted use of those stamps and coins, namely the use itself is not honorific or respectful as they thrown or placed in unclean places.
Although, some Gedolim and Tzadikim, would abstain from using those coins and stamps as mentioned in Tosaffos (ibid.), Orchos Rabbenu (Hosafos p. 3) in regards to the Steipler Gaon zt’l abstaining from the use of some Swiss currency, and others, it was a mainly personal chumra and stringency of the “Bnom shel Kedoshim,” or Holy people. (See also Shoel Umeshiv 1: 3: 71, Minchas Elozor 1: 27 and others)
Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is that it is permitted to daven or recite brochos facing a car with Ontario license plates as not only all the above mentioned conditions in Igrois Moshe apply, it may not even posses the form of a proper cross.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/14/2018 11:10 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1653 The No-Reason Reason
|
|
|
Q. It is widely mentioned that the red heifer is a chok or law without reason, so why does Rashi in Chukas write that it comes to clean up after the golden calf. Let the mother clean up the mess of her son. So there is a reason after all?
A. Moshe Rabbenu, the “Giver of the Torah,” set the standards not to deviate from the mitzvos given to us. A Sefer Torah missing even a part of the smallest detail of a letter is pasul. We humans, who cannot understand fully the true reason of any of the mitzvos, often tend to rationalize them with our own, often wrong ideas. As a result we find heterim and permissions, that can be utterly wrong and harmful. That is exactly what occurred at the greatest of all of our tragedies, the making of the eigel; we rationalized incorrectly. The Parah Aduma, provides the only answer, help and respite. The reason of the Parah Aduma,is that there is no reason. We just follow and do what Hashem wants us to do, without the need to understand the why. As opposed to Shlomo Hamelech, who did deviate and found his own heterim. Moshe Rabbenu was the sole and unique expert on following Hashem’s will to the smallest of details.
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that the chok without reason statement, may apply to other inherent difficulties of the Parah Aduma, such as why it purifies the impure while it defiles the pure, or the fact that behaving like a korban, it is brought outside of the Beis Hamikdash.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/14/2018 12:10 AM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1652 Let’s Be Nice
|
|
|
Q. A teenager leads and accompanies his grandfather suffering from Alzheimer to shul. But the grandfather because of his illness sometimes disturbs other mispaleleim. What is the correct thing to do for the grandson when this happens? Should he take him out of the shul, against his grandfathers will? Should he refuse to bring him to shul anymore? Or should he just ignore the disturbance?
A.
Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is that there are many
variables in the scenario of this question that are crucial. There is
no question that it is important to bring the grandfather to shul.
Besides the inherent mitzva of kivud av, that according to many
Poskim also applies to a grandfather, (See Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 240:
24), it also constitutes an act of very significant chesed since he
wants and enjoys being there. It could likely be essential for the
quality of his life and the mispalelim should be made aware of it and
be more sensitive and forgiving to his needs. Then again, it also
depends on the degree of the disturbance created, which could reach
unacceptable levels. A change in the place of seating may then be the
solution.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/12/2018 10:27 AM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1651 Holy Poroh!
|
|
|
Q. Some say that Parshas Poroh is miduraisso (Biblical) the same as Parshas Zachor. I’ wondering, where is this mentioned in the Torah?
A. According to the Staipler Gaon zt’l (Bircha Peretz – Chukas, end of Shiurin Shel Torah) it derives fro the posuk (end of Metzora); You should warn from becoming contaminated. The Torah obligates Beis Din to separate the nation from becoming impure.
Meshech Chochmo (Chukas) writes that it derives from the separation required by the Torah to separate the Cohen Gadol before Yom Kippur and the Tamud (beginning of Yuma) equating it to the process of the Parah Aduma.
Artzos Hachaim and Emes LeYaakov (Beshalach 15: 25) mention it is included in the remembrance of the making of the eiggel, (Devarim 9: 7), since the Parah Adumah redeems the sin of the golden calf.
Aruch Hashulchan (685: 7) maintains that it is based on the posuk that Parah Adumah is an eternal law (chukas olam), even when we don’t have access to the ashes, we can still read it.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/9/2018 1:48 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1650 Cross Examine
|
|
|
Q. Can you say tehilim and tefilos in a beis olam, where you can see the crosses on the non-Jewish cemetery across the fence?
A. Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is that one should not recite tefilos, brochos or learn Torah when facing a Christian cross. He should turn to another direction even if he does not face now mizrach (east).
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/9/2018 3:17 AM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1649 Change of Scenery
|
|
|
Q. Can you daven lekatchila in a shul that was once a Catholic church?
A. Mishna Berura (154: 45) quotes Mogen Avrohom that if the building has been sold and the idols and statues were removed it is permitted, since the building itself was not worshiped. However, in Biur Halocho he mentions that when idols that are worshiped were placed in the building (as is usual in Catholic churches), although the building after being sold and the idols removed is now permitted for common use, it should not be used as a shul. Many Poskim support this view (Eliyahu Rabba (154:15), Pri Megodim (Eshel Avrohom ibid. 17), Chassam Sofer (Orach Chaim 42), Bnei Zion (63),Maharam Schik (Y. D. 154) et. al.)
Igrois Moishe (O. H. 1: 49) writes that although it became customary in our countries to convert churches into shuls, relying on the opinions of Mogen Avrohom and Mishna Berura, he does not support the view and considers this to be “mous” or repugnant. However, after the fact, he agrees that it is permitted. He recommends to totally remodel the inside of the walls, so the location acquires a new face or ponim chadoshos.
Various denominations of Christian churches do not maintain in their temples any idols that they actually worship and would therefore be permitted when sold and the symbols of their religion are removed.
Chashukei Chemed (Avoda Zarah 47a) mentions that Horav Eliashuv’s zt’l opinion was to be lenient following view of the Mogen Avrohom and Mishna Berura when the inside is redone.
He also permits entering the former church to examine and determine the changes needed.
Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is also to be lenient when remodeling is done. He additionally recommends to use the property for another use a complete year, before turning it into a shul.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/9/2018 3:15 AM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1648 Women’s Rites?
|
|
|
Q. Is there an inyan (or purpose) for women to go to shul and hear Parshas Para Aduma?
A. On question 1281 we wrote: “Many Poskim write that women are exempt from listening to Parshas Parah, even according to the opinions (Tosafos Brochos 13a, Sulchan Aruch O.H. 146: 2 & 685: 7) that maintain it is a mitzva of the Torah for men to read, since the mitzva is on the tzibur or community to procure a Parah Adumah and not on the individuals, as opposed to erasing Amalek's name. Some also see it as a “mitzvas asei shehazman g'ramah”, since it serves as a preparation for Pesach, and adding the fact that it can only be done at daytime, turns it into a time sensitive mitzva, that excludes women.
In addition, the Parah Adumah's purpose is also to atone for the eigel's sin, and women did not partake in it.
However, Nitei Gavriel Purim 22: 4: n. 6) quotes dissenting minhagim. See also Moadim Uzmanim (2: 168).
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is similar to most Poskim and there is no need for women to come to shul for Parshas Parah, unless they follow a particular established family minchag. There is therefore also no need for them to read the parsha at home.”
As mentioned before, there are some opinions that maintain women should listen to Parshas Parah, and some do. Mikroei Kodesh mentions that since the reason for reading this parsha is to prepare the nation to purify themselves with the ashes of the Parah to be able to bring the Korban Pesach, since women take part in the korban, they should also be included in reading the parsha.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/9/2018 3:11 AM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1647 Noshn Lokshn
|
|
|
Q. Is pasta prepared and packaged by non-Jews permitted?
A. See above question. Avnei Yoshfe (Y.D. 139: 1), quoting Chesed LeAvrohom mentions that if a Gentile cooks food to a point where it is partially edible, but a Jew completes the cooking process according to the Mechaber, it constitutes bishul akum, while the Remo maintains that the partial involvement of the Jew is sufficient to be considered bishul Yisroel.(Y.D. 113; 9). Many kashrus institutions, follow the Ashkenazi tradition of the Remo and permit market available dried pasta since it requires further processing. They also allow non-Jewish companies to prepare specific types of food that cannot be used out of the container without further cooking. Since the final stages will be done by a Jew and the product will then be considered bishul Yisrael. Others maintain that air or heat dried products in principle such as pasta don't have any bishul prohibition.
Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a opinion is to be lenient.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/9/2018 2:54 AM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1646 Out of the Frying Pan...
|
|
|
Q. Are potato chips sensitive to the halachos of bishul akum?
A. Our Sages prohibited consuming certain foods cooked by Gentiles in order to limit socialization which might lead to intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews (Taz , Y. D. 113: 7, quoting Tosafos. Avoda Zara, 38a).This prohibition is known as bishul akum. Shulchan Aruch (Y.D. 113: 1) rules that food which can be eaten raw or is not fit for a kings’ table, is not prohibited by bishul akum.
Poskim disagree whether potatoes are fit to be served on a kings’ table or not (Chochmas Odom 66: 4, see Shevet Ha’Levi 6: ,108. Aruch Hashulchan Y.D. 113:18, Yaskil Avdi Y.D. 7:6, Pischei Halacha p. 118: 8).
Regarding potato chips some Poskim maintain that since a fried potato is fit to be served at a kings’ table, potato chips also require bishul Yisroel even though potato chips themselves are not served on kings table. However, most Poskim are lenient. (See Igros Moshe Y.D. 4: 48:5, Emes L’Yaakov Y.D. 113: footnote 42, Shevet Ha’Levi 10: 124. Shulchan Ha’Levi pages 67-72, 341)
Kashrus Kurrents (Spring 2014) writes; The U.S. considers potato chips “junk” food. Obviously, in countries where potato chips reach a king’s state dinner, potato chips would also be subject to the laws of bishul akum.,, The Star-K asked the White House executive chef about the White House banquet policy regarding the use of canned products for state dinners. A specific question was, ‘What is the policy regarding canned cranberry sauce?’ We also asked whether potato chips are served at state dinners. The chef’s response was as follows, “We would serve whatever the guest wants. However, we never served potato chips, nor do we ever use canned goods…everything is prepared fresh!”
The weekly BaKehilla, affiliated with Belz chassidus, reports Maran Rav Yosef Sholom Elyashiv (zt”l) was asked if the category of ‘bishul akum’ applies to potato chips. Maran responded by rhetorically asking “Does President Obama eat [potato] chips?” (Yeshiva News July 17, 2009).
Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit’a position is to be lenient.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as revised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit’a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 3/9/2018 2:35 AM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
Important Numbers
