|
|
|
|
Have a question? Send it in! Questions are answered by Rabbi Bartfeld.
|
|
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
|
|
|
|
|
# 2752 A Lot Of Promise
|
|
|
Kavod Harav, I said that I will take off a chomesh (for maaser) if Hashem gives me a certain yeshua, which He did. However, due to corona, I am not getting paid as much as I was before and I don't want to give chomesh. What should I do? Is it permitted to be matir neder (annul an oath) even though we usually do not nullify vows of tzedeka? Is it necessary since I don't intend to permanently cancel, but just for the duration of corona when I am not able to make as much as before?
A. On question 881 regarding if one forgot to say beli neder when donating for a mi sheberach or telling that he will do any mitzva, we wrote: "It is always better to say b’li neder. However, Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit”a opinion is that when someone did not have in mind to make a neder at all and he also did not remember then the declarations of annulment made in Kol Nidrei or Hatoras Nedarim, in need he may rely on them to avoid additional Hatoras Nedarim
However, if he did use an expression of neder when he donated tzedaka, or he answered amen to “ba’abur shenodar” said aloud by the gabay reciting a “mi sheberach” for him, it does become a neder if he omitted adding then b’li neder."
It would then be better to do hatoras neder, in case later on he forgets or can't comply with the neder.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/13/2020 4:47 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2751 Beginning or the End?
|
|
|
Q. A person who came to Mincha and after saying Hashem sefosai tiftoch and Baruch ata Hashem realized there are no asara mispallelim (minyan) present. May he say lamdeini chukecha and daven in a later minyan (where there will be asara), or do we say that once he started shemonessrei he may not stop, even though it won't be tefilla btzibbur?
A. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that once he said the name of Hashem at the brocho he should continue with the rest of the amida, even if there is no mimyan. (He may daven a voluntary tefilas nedava later on with a minyan).
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/13/2020 4:30 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2750 Garden Varieties
|
|
|
Q. Kvod Harav. Thank you so much for all your divrai torah and yard hospitality. It is so good to be able to be back davening betzibur.
I was listening to a shiur today by Rav Shachter shlita and he called into question a practice that is done in backyard minyanim.
According to what he said all ten of a minyan should be in the same room in order for kaddish, kedusha, and kriyas hatorah.
He said that even a mechitza of ten tefachim ( which does exist between two backyards or from a deck to the yard below )is enough to consider it a separate room and create problems. He said if ten are gathered in one space those on the outside can answer amen but ten need to be together.
I am recent to backyard minyanim and maybe this has already been discussed but I was wondering if yourself or if R. Shlomo Miller shlita discussed the matter and if there is sufficient reason to be makpid on this matter?
A. On question 2610 the first of several regarding backyard minyonim, although there are fences between the properties, we wrote "Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that although there are dissenting opinions, in times of need even if the fence is tall and one can only see the other participants when standing on his porch, and watching over a wooden fence, he can still be part of the minyan.
A person in quarantine can also join by watching from his property, as Horav Pam Shlit'a commented, "he is not in nidui (excommunicated)."
However, they may accept or even offer to recite kaddish for those unable to come to a minyan.
(See also questions 2629, 2630. 2638, and others)
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/13/2020 3:36 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2749 The Letter On The Law
|
|
|
Q. Referring tp Parshas Chukas. Is there a saying of Chazal that even the Mishpatim or the logical mitzvos are also Chukim or laws that we cannot understand?
A. Alshich on Parshas Mishpatim and others amply explain that the reason the Torah ordained that the Mishpatim should be set before the Jewish Nation and not before the Gentiles, even when they judge a certain law similarly to the laws of Israel, is because our Mishpatim are the laws of Hashem and not man-made.
On Parshas Behar (Vayikra 25:1) we read: "And you will do (va’Asisem) my ‘Chukim’ and my ‘Mishpatim’ you will guard (Tishmoru).” The Torah uses a different ordinance when referring to Chukim than when referring to Mishpatim.
Chukim are those laws in the Torah we apparently don't understand the reason for, like the prohibition not to eat meat and milk together or wear Shatnez (linen and wool together). However, Mishpotim are rules that govern the relationships between people. They are decrees for which we presumably know their reason and they actually ‘make sense.’ Examples are the prohibition of killing, stealing and damaging others. These are laws that any civilized society and developed democratic country would enact. The human mind would have come to the realization that these laws are necessary to survive as a civilized society.
Everyone accepts that it is wrong to murder. A society cannot survive when people kill each other. Yet perhaps there will be a government that will rule that in special situations it is correct to permit killing others, as was so popular in Second World War Germany. In our days mercy killing is not unheard off.
Therefore, our Torah commands us, that when it comes to Mishpatim, we have to "guard" them. Do not tamper and meddle with them. Don't rationalize and argue that they don't apply in this special situation. They are after all, also the laws of Hashem.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/13/2020 3:29 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2748 Save That Vav
|
|
|
Q. I was leining at Shabbos Mincha and didn't see the traditional Vav Keti'a in the Sefer Torah. Upon closer inspection, I saw that the Sofer had merely used his knife and cut the very bottom of the Vav so that it appeared as if a hair was sitting below the Vav. When I attempted to wipe or blow off the offending hair from the parchment it did not budge leading me to the conclusion that it was indeed not a hair but rather the Sofer's attempt at a Vav Keti'a.
Is the Vav Keti'a obligatory?
I understand that some Poskim maintain that the Vav should not be cut near the top because then it makes it look like there is a Yud there and therefore the Vav should be cut about 2/3 of the way down so that it has the appearance of a Vav, albeit a shortened one. Others maintain that it is not necessary to avoid cutting the Vav near the top since it is obligatory that a Yud have a Kutzo shel Yud and this letter, being a Vav, has no Kutzo shel Yud and thus cannot be a Yud.
A. On question 1133 regarding an unusual shayla in Parshas Pinchas when the baal koreh noticed that someone, probably out of simple ignorance, corrected the Vav-Ketia on the word shalom (you could see that there was some ink added to the gap), if another Sefer Torah has to be taken ou. To what we answered: "There are a number of different opinions in regards to the need, origin and ways to write the vav- ketiah. The Talmud (Kidushin 66b) mentions in the name of Rav Yehuda quoting Shmuel, that the source of the rule that the service (avoda) performed by a blemished (baal mum) Cohen, is invalid, is the posuk: (Bamidbar 25: 12) “Behold, I give him My covenant of peace.” Meaning, as Rav Nachman explains, that since the letter vav of “Shalom” is truncated, it reads rather as “Shalem” or complete and unblemished.
Some maintain the this vav, belongs to the group of small letters in the Torah. (Medresh Rabbi Akiva – Botei Medroshos p.479). Others (Minchas Shai (ibid.) quoting Ritva, Shut. Rabi Akiva Eiger 75, et. al.) opine that it is a regular sized letter but with a shorter foot; larger than a yud but shorter than a regular vav. They also assert, that even the opinions that it is read as a yud, still hold that it is a bit larger than a regular yud (ibid.)
Many avert that it is a regular vav that is split or truncated somewhere in the middle. Where in the middle is also subject to different opinions, as well as the angle of the split (Ohr Torah quoted in Minchas Shai ibid. et. al.).
Some Poskim maintain that the Halacha does not follow Rav Nachman, and there is no vav-ketiah at all. They emphasize that no such vav is found in ancient Sifrei Torah or mentioned in Rambam or Tur-Shulchan Aruch (Pachad Yitzchak – Sefer Torah p, 148, quoting The Venetian Sages). Some communities like the Yemenite, do not have that tradition at all. While Shevet Hakehassi Y.D. 1: 297 mentions it is a Halacha LeMoshe MeSinai.
There is also mention of other vavin ketios in the Torah, such as the vav of “Vatomos Sarah” (Bereshis 23: 2 – Machzor Vitri p. 677) or “Eileh Keruei Haeidah” (Bamidbar 1: 16 – Baal Haturim).
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that it was unnecessary to take out another Sefer Torah, even according to those who maintain that tradition, as it is only a Masores. He also suggested that since this occurred in a weekday, it could have been easily fixed by just scratching the vav with a pin or similar."
The Rov also maintains that if the vav appears to be another letter, such as a yud, following the proper halachos of determining that. another sefer should be taken out."
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller Shlit"a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/12/2020 1:01 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2747 The Spreading Firestorm
|
|
|
|
Q. Some people connect the burning of the sefarim in Paris on 1242 to the fire on Notre Dame last year. Is there anything to that? (See questions 2730 and 2746)
A.
Last year on Monday evening April 15 2019, the news broke of the
massive fire that almost consumed Notre Dame, the large cathedral in
Paris. The fire took place, very close to the Place de Grève, the
site where 777 years ago, the burning of the Talmud occurred. It was
last year during the week before Pesach, and on that Monday morning
we read Parshas Acharei Mos. We mentioned then the death of Aharon's
two sons, when they drew near before Hashem, and they died by fire
because they offered a strange unordered fire on the mizbeach .
Tragically as that was, it concurred during the inauguration of the
redeeming and life giving Mishkan, that gave us the presence of
the Shechina. As mentioned above, the Torah will demand sacrifice,
but at the same time it is Toras Chaim, or the giver of life.
However,
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is to avoid making any such
connections and links with events of the past, as we may not be
accurate
at all.
Rabbi
A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller and
Horav Aharon Miller
Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/9/2020 5:56 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2746 That Really Burn Us Up
|
|
|
Q. (See question 2730). Thank you for explaining that unusual fast of Erev Shabbos Chukas. Although I understand the remez (allusion) in the Targum, still what connection does the burning of the sefarim have with parshas Chukas itself?
A. Parshas Chukas refers to the mitzva of Parah Aduma. It represents the quintessential illogical mitzvah that contains and exposes no rational conception of why we do it. We perform the mitzvah simply because it is Hashem’s will. That is exactly its point, strength and the reason why it purifies.
In addition the parsha mentions " Zois Hatorah adam ki yomus b'ohel - This is the law: when a man dies in a tent." (Bamidbar 19: 14). Our Sages explain (Brochos 63b), that this posuk teaches a most important and fundamental principle about learning Torah, namely, that the Torah will not survive and be extant, unless one is ready to give his life for it. ("Meimis Atzmo Aleha"). Those two points definitely connect this parsha to the tragic future events.
There is no question that the burning of that collection of seforim in Paris, at a time when every book was painstakingly written by hand and when many were original and irreplaceable, was a most terrible tragedy. It represented the destruction of generations of Jewish learning and work. It’s estimated that the wagons held about 10,000 sefarim and manuscripts. For how many Sages and Baalei Tosafos, it represented the extinction of a life's work!
Yet as we commemorate that catastrophe, we realize that not only we have survived, the Torah itself has not only survived but multiplied exponentially. As the eternal words said by Rabi Chaninah ben Teradion, testify. He was one of the Ten Martyrs executed for having defied the Roman ban on teaching Torah. When burned alive at the stake together with the forbidden Torah scrolls, which he had been teaching, managed to proclaim with a smile to his many talmidim and followers, for all of history: "I see the scrolls burning but the letters survived, flying up in the air."
True the Torah will demand sacrifice, but at the same time it is Toras Chaim, or the giver of life.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/9/2020 5:43 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2745 Casual Dress?
|
|
|
Q. The Gemara in Pesachim 112 says not to wear clothing for eight days after they were laundered. But there is a takana of Ezra Hasofer to launder on Thursday to have clean clothing for Shabbos (a day later). How are we to reconcile this?
A. Indeed Talmud Pesachim 112b mentions in the name of Abaye that "one who washes his clothes and does not wait eight days before donning them again causes lice to rejuvenate and can cause tzoraas."
However, Ben Yehoyada maintains, as is obvious from the Gemara, that the above only applies to clothing that was infected with lice, but garments that was not infected or had the lice shaken off before washing, can be worn immediately after laundering. He adds that this is the reason we do not wait eight days in our times. However, Taama DeKra (1) mentions that the Chazon Ish was careful in this regard, and did wait.
The simple answer is is that one washes clothing on Thursday following the Takana of Ezra (Baba Kama 82a), but it is for honoring the next week's Shabbos. and one uses it the week after.
Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a added that there is an opinion that the eight days are counted from the day the clothing was last used.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/9/2020 5:20 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2744 A Halfway House?
|
|
|
Q. I am learning about money management from a secular book. It suggests leaving the house to your children from the first marriage. What does Jewish law say about this if you're in a second marriage? It doesn't seem right for your kids to kick him out, but what if they need the money?
A. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that in principle in Halacha. there would not be any significant difference between the offspring of the first or second marriage. However, there are likely other significant issues involved, that can be decisive and may also be complicated, therefore all details should be carefully considered.
The Rov's usual opinion is that cases that involve monies or properties that different parties have a claim to, should be decided by a Beis Din or Rov that can hear properly and clearly the claims and details of each party.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/9/2020 4:08 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2743 Noach Would Be Proud
|
|
|
Q. My fourth question is: How far can this go? We know that when someone is going through the process of giyur, they are supposed to begin observing all hilchos Shabbos, but still have to do one melacha or shvus privately each week until they finish their giyur. Is it possible for Bnai Noach who are very serious about Hashem, Torah and following the Sheva Mitzvos to voluntarily accept upon themselves to abstain from a lot of melachos on Shabbos, as long as they don't fully stop doing melacha. Obviously, most of them will probably end up doing many melachos even if they don't intend to because of their lack of knowledge of the halachos. But this would be a step beyond my previous question where they would like to abstain from a number of activities beyond not using their phones/computers. Would that be OK?
Thank you, and with great appreciation.
A. See question above, and also questions 521 and 1626 regarding teaching Bnai Noach Torah. On question
1150 regarding if it is permissible for them to put up a Mezzuza on their front door, we wrote; "Although Rambam (Perush Hamishnayos – Terumos 3: 9, H. Melochim 10: 10) teaches that a Ben Noach is rewarded with some remuneration for observing the mitzvos he was not ordained to do, he should abstain from the ones that carry kedusha and tahara, such as tefilin, Sefer Torah and mezuzah. (Ridvaz ibid.)
Minchas Kino'os (9: 35) quotes Talmud Yerushalmi (Peah 1: 1) that Rebbi sent Artaban a mezuzah with the intention of providing some security and protection for him. (It is of interest that Yerushalmi Avoda Zarah 2: 1, says in the future Bnai Noach will accept all mitzvos including mezuzah).
Veshav Verofo (Y.D. 58) quotes Rav Ovadya Yosef zt'l as permitting placing a mezuzah in a Ben Noach's house, when one knows that he will honour it properly.
However, Yalkut Yosef (Kivud Av Va’em 6: 15) mentions that if an ill Gentile father asks his son to place a mezuzah on his door for protection, he should abstain.
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that if the Noahide is careful to honor the mezuzah properly, he may place it in the inner rooms, but not on the outside of the entrance door."
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/9/2020 3:50 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2742 The Best of All Fasts
|
|
|
Q. My third question is:(See questions 2740-41 above): If that is OK, could they then accept upon themselves some restrictions. For example, it is popular today for people to do a "media fast" where they don't use their phones or computers. Would undertaking that kind of voluntary abstinence from technology in addition to honoring the Shabbat be OK?
A. See answer above regarding the observance of Shabbos for a prospective ger.
Horav Shlomo Miller's usual opinion is that "media fasts" should be encouraged as much as possible for all and at all times.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/9/2020 3:48 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2741 Shoimer Sabbath Koidesh
|
|
|
Q. (See question 2740 above). The second question is one that I am constantly being asked by Bnai Noach. It involves to what degree they may observe Shabbos.
Until now, I have been advising people that while they may not fully observe Shabbos as a Jew would in terms of avoiding melacha, it is probably OK for them to honor the Shabbos. This would mean that they could have special meals, dedicate more time for prayer and study, enjoying the company of friends, enjoying nature. etc.
So my first question is: Is that an acceptable m'halech (manner) for Bnai Noach?
A. On question 112 regarding someone in the conversion process that realizes that he cannot keep Shabbos completely, if he has have to perform an Av Melacha, or suffices violating something Rabbinical, we wrote: "Two reasons are mentioned for prohibiting a Gentile keeping Shabbos. Firstly, the Talmud (Sanhedrin 58b) quotes as a source the verse (Bereishis 8,22): “Day and night they shall not cease (work)”. A second reason is found in the Midrash (Devarim ch. 1,23) that cites the verse; “Between me and Bnai Isroel, (Shabbos) is a sign forever” (Shemos 31,17). See also Talmud Beitzah 16a.
There are Poiskim who maintain that once a Gentile has decided to convert to Judaism, has initiated the process by consulting a Bais Din, and was instructed to begin keeping Mitzvos including Shabbos, (so he will become accustomed to keeping them), he is permitted to observe Shabbos completely. (Toisfois Yshonim, Y'bomos 48b, Responsa Leib Aryeh 33, Ois Leisroel 34, Zahav Mordechai p.55). It is apparent from the Midrash (ibid.) that just deciding to circumcise, will permit him to keep Shabbos. Some Poiskim however, require the Bris to be already done (see Binyan Tzion 1,91).
To avoid desecrating Shabbos for someone in such a situation, a number of suggestions have been proposed; such as wearing a Taalis in a street that has no Eiruv on Shabbos, or to do work immediately after the end of Shabbos, (Since in the Gentile’s day, the night follows the day).
If we are to follow the reason for prohibiting a Gentile to keep Shabbos given by the Talmud (ibid.) that “they should not rest”, both the Rambam (Shabbos 21,1 ) and the Ramban (Beginning of p. Kedoishim) consider a Rabbinic infringement of Shabbos (a shvus), as a breach in the Biblically ordained rest of Shabbos.
Horav Shlomo Miller’s Shlit”a opinion is that it suffices to do a issur d’rabbonon."
The items you mentioned such as special meals, dedicating more time for prayer and study, enjoying the company of friends, should indeed be encouraged, as a preparation for conversion.
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a is that the same would apply to Bnai Noach.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/9/2020 3:34 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2740 No Returns?
|
|
|
1) June 23 Chukas B. Q. My first (question) is regarding a situation I was asked about from a ger tzedek. He heard that there is talk about conversions being annulled. So, I wanted to ask for him:
Is it ever possible for a Beit Din to rescind someone's giyur, and more importantly, under what kind of circumstances? His concern is that he has an issue with a rabbi in the community, and is afraid to seek resolution or complain for fear that there may be retribution against him with the possible resultant loss of his status as a ger.
A. In principle once someone converted properly, namely by a recognized orthodox Beis Din, immersing properly in a kosher mikva, and accepting to comply with all the mitzvos of the Torah, the conversion cannot be annulled.
It happens from time to time that questions and doubts may surface regarding any of the factors mentioned above and a Posek or Beis Din may decide to repeat the gerus process. It is unlikely it would happen when the Beis Din who undertook and certified the conversion was an accepted and expert Beis Din dedicated to gerus.
The above usually applies, even when after a proper and recognized conversion, the ger does not comply in actual practice with all the mitzvos accepted. (Yebamos 47b. Rambam H. Gerus 13: 17, Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 117: 2).
There are some exceptions to the above, as in the case of a ger kotton or minor who was properly converted together with his parents or by being adopted by a Jewish family. In such case, the minor has the option to rescind the conversion when he or she reach the age of mitzvos compliance. If there is disapproval or rejection of mitzvos at that time, the conversion will become annulled.
There are other more singular situations such as the case mentioned in Igrois Moshe (Y.D. 2: 124), when it was obvious that a woman converted for the purpose of marriage and then the marital opportunity dissolved, questioning if it was a "mistaken gerus" or not. There are other similar cases to be found in the Teshuvos.
There is much debate in Halacha Teshuvos on conversions that were done, when it was obvious that the converts did not have the intention to comply with the mitzvos they openly accepted.
Likely, the best option for this particular ger tzedek is to approach the Rov or Beis Din that did his conversion and ask for their help. in his problem.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/8/2020 5:40 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2739 Goodbye Kiss?
|
|
|
Q. I'm always makpid (careful) to kiss my tzitzis during shema. Now I'm wearing a mask during davening as recommended for my age. How can I kiss the tzitzis when all I'll be doing is kissing the inside of the mask?
A. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that you may still move slightly and momentarily your mask an kiss the tzitzis. Besides, even if this is not doable, the demonstration of appreciation and reverence for the mitzva , would remain even when the kiss is separated by the mask.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/8/2020 1:07 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2738 Lean and Mean
|
|
|
Q. On question 2712 you wrote that on Shabbat one can lean on the tree slightly, when not moving it. but one can't place a siddur on a tree. Can one leave his chair leaning slightly on a tree on an angle, so it will not get wet it rains?
A. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion, as explained by Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a is that one should not leave a chair even slightly leaning on a tree, since this would be considered "mishtamesh beilon" or using a tree. As opposed to one leaning a bit on a tree, that is permitted when the tree does not move or shake, since one has control of his body and can immediately stop inclining on it.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/8/2020 12:56 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2737 The Bird that Flew Away
|
|
|
Q. When one wants to do the great mitzva of shiluach haken, does he actually have to take hold of the bird and then send it away? What happens if as he was approaching the nest, it just flew away, was he mekayem the mitzva?
A. On Talmud (Chulin 141b) there are different opinions on the proper way to comply with this mitzva, and Poskim also maintain different rulings whether one has to hold on to the bird by its wings or feet (they differ on two of Rashi's interpretations). Rambam (H. Shechita 13: 5) asserts that he has to hold on to its wings, so does the Ran and Chassam Soffer (O.H. 100) in his name.
However, Chazon Ish (Y.D. 175: 2) rules that in practice, there is no difference whether one took hold of the mother-bird and then send it away or just chased it. He also maintains that there is no prohibition to hold on to the bird, when his intention is to send it away.
Sefer Kan Tzipor relates that this was the way the Satemar Rebbeh zt'l complied with this mitzva. Similarly, Shaleach Teshalach (p. 47) quotes the testimony of many Gedolim including Horav Shach, RS'Z Auerbach, zt'l, that they complied by just chasing away the mother-bird without holding it first, as the Rambam maintains.
Poskim mention that one should be careful when approaching the nest, to have in mind to comply with the mitzva, if the mother bird just flies away by itself as often happens.
Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is similar.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/8/2020 12:37 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2736 Cast a Spell
|
|
|
Q. Can you please tell me what the proper Hebrew spelling for Newmarket would be? And when writing it on a Kesubah, would it be proper to identify Newmarket (Ontario, Canada), as
הסמוכה לוואן or as הסמוכה לטאראנטא ?
A. Horav Shlomo Miller's Shlit'a opinion is that the spelling is נומארקעט (nun vov mem alef reish kuf ayin tes), without any Hasemucho.
Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a explained that his father maintains it is spelled without an alef after the vov as New Jersey would be, because it is one single word.
Horav Dovid Pam's Shlit'a opinion is similar. However, Horav Moshe M. Lowy's Shlit'a opinion is that yo do write, "Hasemucho LeToronto."
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/8/2020 12:26 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2735 A Pearl On Wisdom
|
|
|
Q. Why is the bracha on the amida of Atta Chonen, on which we pray for wisdom and understanding, be said before the bracha of Hashivenu Letoratecha or returning and keeping the Torah? Should not the observance of the Torah and mitzvos have priority?
A. Talmud (Megila 17b) explains the reason why the brocho on teshuva follows the one on wisdom, based on the posuk (Yeshayahu 6: 10) "And his heart will understand, and then he will repent and be healed." As Rashi explains "They will understand with their heart, and return to Me, and this will be their cure."
Wisdom will grant a person the will, humbleness and opportunity to do teshuva and also will direct him on the way to follow. (See Mishna Berura 115: 1).
It is also the power and holiness inherent in Torah learning that will prompt and bring a person to do teshuva.
Our sages teach in regard to why havdalah is recited on Shabbos end, in this particular brocho, because if "ein daas, havdoloh minain," without wisdom you cannot recognize and tell the difference between Shabbos and weekdays. The same principle is essential in performing teshuva.
It is interesting to note that of all the middle blessings, the only one that begins with a praise to Hashem first is "atta chonen." All others start with a supplication.
The reason may well be that in order to be successful when using our wisdom and understanding, is when we know and appreciate that it is a gift from Hashem, and only when it follows His will, it has meaning, future and opportunity.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/3/2020 12:22 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2734 Forgive But Don't Forget
|
|
|
Q. In the Shemoneh Esrei, there is an optional prayer for forgiveness where you confess your willful sins since childhood. I thought our slate was wiped clean every Yom Kippur and upon marriage, so why would we keep bringing them up, unless we keep doing them?
A. A. The Rambam (H. Teshuva 1: 3, based on Talmud Shevuos 13a) and other Poskim rule that Yom Kippur does not absolve and forgive sins committed, unless one does proper teshuva and repents on them completely. Therefore one may still have to continue the teshuva efforts and praying for help and forgiveness, even after Yom Kippur.
Besides, there are many madregos and steps in the scale of the teshuva process, including teshuva meahava, or repentance based on pure and sincere love to Hashem. If achieved, the sins once committed, actually turn now into mitzvos. That is a long and continuous process that likely involves a complete lifetime of worthwhile effort and praying.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/3/2020 12:13 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2733 The Making of a Name
|
|
|
Q. Teshuvos Betzel Hachachma (3:41) writes that one shouldn't name a shul or other holy place after a mechalel shabbos, for example, if a frum person wanted to donate a shul in memory of his parents who were mechalelei shabbos, they shouldn't mention the parents names. If I want to donate something liluy nishmas my grandparents who were not frum, what should I do? I am thinking along the lines of, sponsoring the printing of a sefer, donating sfarim to a shul, or contributing a significant amount to building a shul. Can it be written that these things were sponsored liluy nishmas my grandfather? Would it make a difference if nobody in the shul knows who they were and that they were mechalel shabbos?
A) On question 2565 regarding shalach manos to a non-frum individual, we wrote: It may depend on the reason why he does not keep mitzvos yet, since he may have never been educated or informed on Torah values. Thus he may be regarded as a “tinok shenishba,” and only accidentally a non-believer. (See Piskei Teshuvos 695: 11).
See also similar question 647 and 1707 regarding mourning for non-frum relatives and question 254 concerning the appending of the term a”h to the name of the deceased, if the deceased was not observant.
As mentioned in the last answer, it also depends on the traditions of the shul.
Rabbi A. Bartfeld as advised by Horav Shlomo Miller and Horav Aharon Miller Shlit'a
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 7/3/2020 12:01 PM |
Tell a Friend
| Ask The Rabbi |
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
|
Important Numbers
