The Torah tells us that not only were Korach and his cohorts swallowed alive;
their wives and children also died in this extraordinary fashion. Rashi comments
(Bamidbar 16, 27) that the gravity of this punishment helps us comprehend
the severity of quarreling. While a court of law only punishes a man after he
reaches the age of thirteen, and Heaven only punishes from the age of twenty,
quarreling is so serious an infraction that even the nursing babies perished as
a result. Why did the children, who were in no way involved in the dispute,
deserve to die alongside their parents?
Rav Wolbe answers with the following Sforno. In the Aseres
HaDibros we read, “Who visits the sin of the forefathers upon their
children on the third and fourth generations.” The Sforno explains that
Hashem waits until the fourth generation to mete out punishment, because when
four consecutive generations sin in the same manner, the sin becomes entrenched
- part and parcel of their very personality – and there is no hope that they
will ever do teshuva. Similarly, the children of Korach were born into a
situation where a terrible quarrel raged. The severity of machlokes is
such that it can leave an indelible impression even on the second generation.
Arguing would become part of their nature. Moreover, the knowledge that their
fathers disagreed so adamantly with Moshe would cause them to forever second
guess Moshe Rabbeinu’s qualifications as a leader. Therefore, the only option
was for them to perish along with their parents, and thus effectively preventing
any possibility of the continuation of this machlokes.
One of the six hundred and thirteen commandments is, “And one shall
not be like Korach and his followers” (Bamidbar 17, 5). Rav Wolbe
cautions that this commandment applies even when one has good intentions and
acts for the sake of heaven. Nevertheless, he may not cause machlokes.
One must be especially careful when he acts “lesheim shamayim”
because he often thinks that this gives him the license to do as he pleases. The
Mishna in Avos states, “Any argument in which people argue for
the sake of heaven will endure… Any argument that is not for the sake of heaven
will not endure.” Rav Yisroel Salanter explains this Mishna
homiletically. When two businessmen get into an argument, at the end of the day
they will make amends and drink a beer together. However, when one feels that he
is arguing for the sake of heaven, the quarrel will never end. How could he give
in when Heaven’s honor is at stake? Such a machlokes will endure
forever!
Any machlokes, even with the best of intentions, can have terrible
repercussions. The Alter of Kelm writes that Korach must have had truly lofty
intentions, for if he did not, the pans he used to sacrifice the incense would
not have become holy and would not have been converted into plating for the
mizbeiach. Despite his intentions, the machlokes caused the demise
of his entire family. This being the case, could there be any cause for which it
is truly worthwhile to create a machlokes?
This dvar
Torah was compiled by the family of the Mashgiach Harav Shlomo
ben R’ Moshe z"l, l’iluy nishmaso